{{item.title}}
{{item.text}}
{{item.title}}
{{item.text}}
After decades of outsourcing and offshoring, American manufacturing is on the cusp of an unexpected revival. What’s driving the momentum? Technological leaps in robotics and AI and a renewed America-first trade stance that’s reshaping the economics of global supply chains.
Washington’s recent trade policies raise import costs by placing tariffs on foreign-made goods. In parallel, the cost of advanced robots is falling while capabilities are rising, making it more feasible to onshore production. Tariffs, often seen as protectionist, could end up turbocharging development and innovation in US factories.
This moment demands a two-pronged approach: Leveraging available robotics technologies to bolster reshoring efforts, while investing aggressively in building a world-class domestic robotics and automation base for the future. This strategy reflects a broader transformation underway in American manufacturing –– one that can be framed by four key imperatives: Reshore, rebalance, rebuild and reimagine. These imperatives offer a roadmap for proactively shaping a more resilient, innovative and competitive industrial base.
Instead of low-wage labor overseas, the next competitive advantage will come from automation, smart logistics and skilled talent at home. This convergence of policy and tech is a wake-up call for industrial executives.
The factory of the future is being built today –– with robots at the center. According to the International Federation of Robotics, US companies installed over 44,000 industrial robots in 2023 alone, up 12% from the previous year. The automotive sector led, with carmakers and suppliers accounting for one-third of those installations. Industries from electronics to metals to plastics are rapidly following suit with futuristic humanoid bots on assembly lines.
A chronic labor shortage is accelerating automation. Even with competitive wages, manufacturers struggle to fill technical roles, pushing many to automate tasks they simply can’t staff. Robots offer a dependable alternative.
Meanwhile, robotics technology has matured dramatically. Today’s “cobots” (collaborative robots) are safer, smarter and more affordable, capable of working alongside humans on even precise tasks without heavy safety barriers. Advances in AI, machine vision and intuitive programming simplify automation integration –– even for mid-sized manufacturers that were previously priced out.
The convergence of AI and robotics is unlocking smart manufacturing capabilities that were once unimaginable. AI is increasingly being used to analyze production data in real time and automatically redirect robotic cells to handle a sudden change in demand or a supply shortage.
US companies installed over 44,000 industrial robots in 2023 alone, up 12% from the previous year.
While technology opens the door for an American manufacturing comeback, policy is giving it a firm push. In early 2025, the White House unveiled a sweeping reciprocal tariff program. These are not token fees. For industries with global supply chains, the impact is dramatic. As of May 15, PwC estimates US industrial tariff exposure could jump from about $23 billion a year to $127 billion. And in TMT, that jump could be from $13 billion to $126 billion. Those kinds of cost surges could hit the bottom line hard. It would effectively penalize the old offshoring and may incentivize domestic industries. Whether or not trading partners officially lower their barriers long-term in this fluid environment, US companies are faced with more expensive imports.
In parallel, however, US labor costs remain substantially higher than those of many
overseas markets. Advanced automation can help offset labor costs, yet much of today's advanced automation technology –– industrial robots, AI-enabled systems –– is also sourced from regions now subject to tariffs, compounding the challenge.
While purchasing foreign automation tools may be necessary in the short term, the US should simultaneously invest in building a robust, domestic robotics industry. This dual-track approach –– importing what we need today while developing what we must own tomorrow –– is a viable path to lasting competitiveness.
The US is also aiming to sweeten the pot for local production through tax incentives. The administration has floated lowering the corporate tax rate for manufacturers as a reward for increasing domestic output. Massive federal investments have flowed into critical manufacturing-related areas –– like the CHIPS Act and certain incentives under the Inflation Reduction Act –– helping to boost critical manufacturing.
The economic case for a robotics-driven, domestic supply chain becomes clearer under these conditions. If importing key components now carries a 30% –– or potentially more –– premium, the higher upfront cost of building high-tech factories in the US might be more attractive, especially if those factories are highly automated to keep unit costs competitive. Many companies are already reevaluating their global manufacturing strategies in response to supply chain vulnerabilities and geopolitical risks. Implementing automation for even a portion of routine tasks can lead to significant efficiency gains, making domestic production more competitive.
Beyond pure cost, there are strategic benefits. Shorter supply chains mean less inventory in transit and less vulnerability to disruptions (whether a pandemic or a port closure or a geopolitical conflict). Domestic manufacturing with renewable-powered facilities cuts emissions from overseas shipping, supporting sustainability goals. An America-first strategy could help catalyze a greener approach to making goods.
Policy moves, however, can be a double-edged sword. Trading partners might retaliate with their own tariffs. Executives need to stay agile, monitoring trade policy updates and customs clarifications like forthcoming rules from US Customs and Border Protection on the new tariffs to avoid supply chain snags. The big takeaway is that the calculus for where to manufacture is changing. The total landed cost of an imported widget versus a domestically produced (but highly automated) widget is tipping in favor of the latter, making local automation development a key lever for future competitiveness. These developments are prompting companies to more quickly reassess their global operational footprint on a longer-term basis.
The lines between industrial and digital sectors are blurring. The automotive industry offers a case in point. Today’s cars are as much software as hardware, and building next-gen vehicles involves coordination between robot makers, chip suppliers, software developers and manufacturers.
Strategic partnerships are on the rise. Big tech firms are investing in industrial applications of their AI and cloud platforms. And manufacturers are teaming up with technology and consulting partners to fill their capability gaps. Workforce development is equally critical. Successful manufacturers aren’t only automating tasks. They’re upskilling and elevating their workforce to collaborate with technology. Robots take over the repetitive, dangerous or very precise tasks, freeing up humans for higher-level roles in programming, maintenance, quality control and innovation. But unlocking this value requires investment in people. Cross-industry cooperation with educational institutions and training providers can pipeline new talent into manufacturing –– people skilled in mechatronics, data analysis and process engineering.
The big hurdle to full implementation is often data and trust. Few companies truly know their supply chain in detail, down to every tier of supplier, but having that visibility is key to unlocking benefits like tariff optimization and agile production. Those who build it — through digital control towers, blockchain-based sourcing and real-time analytics — can gain significant speed, reliability and tariff optimization. Cross-industry data collaboration may be sensitive, but it’s becoming essential to compete in a globalized, automated world. While America promotes domestic manufacturing, other nations are not standing still. China, for instance, is aggressively expanding its robotics and high-tech manufacturing capabilities, and their homegrown efforts now supply nearly half of the robots sold in China and a significant portion globally.
The next wave of innovation –– in electric vehicles, clean energy, advanced electronics, biotech –– will favor those with prolific manufacturing capabilities. By fostering synergy between US tech innovation and manufacturing prowess, American companies can set the pace in emerging industries and enable new products, innovation and business models.
For manufacturers, the four Rs –– reshoring, rebalancing, rebuilding and reimagining –– serve as near-term imperatives to improve operational resilience and cost competitiveness.
Here are key considerations and recommendations as you plot your course.
Reconfigure your operations with automation in mind. Assess which parts of your production and supply chain can be transitioned back to US soil – especially those ripe for robotic transformation. Map your processes end-to-end and identify pain points or labor-intensive steps that hold you back. Are there bottlenecks where automation could dramatically boost throughput or quality? Executives should challenge their teams: If we had to produce our goods in a high-cost country (like the US) and still make a profit, how would we do it?
Audit your supply chain for tariff exposure, geopolitical risk or overdependence on any one region or vendor. Consider qualifying second sources domestically or from US-friendly trade partners. In other cases, you might decide to produce components in-house with automation if suppliers become too costly. Data is a critical enabler. Invest in systems that give you a digital bill of materials (BOM) with traceability of each part’s origin. Upgrading your ERP and supply chain IT systems could reap significant ROI here. Make sure your IT backbone can handle real-time planning, integrate with robotics, and provide the analytics needed for quick decision-making.
Invest in R&D and innovation. The next wave of competitiveness will depend on adopting existing automation as well as building new domestic capabilities. With tariffs also affecting imported robotics and smart systems, cultivating a strong US-based automation and AI innovation base becomes even more strategic. Also, leverage available incentives –– federal R&D tax credits, manufacturing USA institutes and regional innovation hubs can offset costs. Don’t leave money on the table.
A robotics strategy will falter without a human strategy alongside it. This means identifying the new roles needed –– such as robot technicians, data analysts, AI supervisors, maintenance specialists for advanced equipment –– and training your people to fill them.
Long-term leadership demands more than reshoring –– it requires treating automation and emerging technologies as core to national competitiveness. US manufacturers and tech firms can help lead the way in building robotics, AI systems and semiconductor capabilities onshore. This transformation may require coordinated federal investment, bold state-level incentives and targeted industrial policies that prioritize innovation alongside economic security.
That national ambition also applies to workforce development. As demand grows for digital and mechatronic skill sets, the US must reimagine how it develops, retains and scales talent in critical tech-manufacturing fields. Consider this digital transformation and industrial reinvention –– powered by both technology and talent. In an environment where technological supremacy defines geopolitical influence, building domestic capacity in robotics, AI and advanced manufacturing is not just an economic goal, it's a matter of national resilience.
© 2017 - 2025 PwC. All rights reserved. PwC refers to the PwC network and/or one or more of its member firms, each of which is a separate legal entity. Please see www.pwc.com/structure for further details.